The Contribution of an Internal Review Panel to the Development of Educational Programming. Satellite Technology Demonstration, Technical Report No. 0213.

Autor/inn/en	Connolly, A. J.; Anderson, Frank
Institution	Federation of Rocky Mountain States, Inc., Denver, CO.
Titel	The Contribution of an Internal Review Panel to the Development of Educational Programming. Satellite Technology Demonstration, Technical Report No. 0213.
Quelle	(1975), (11 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Career Education; Communications Satellites; Curriculum Development; Educational Media; Educational Programs; Educational Television; Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Formative Evaluation; Junior High School Students; Program Evaluation; Secondary Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Arbeitslehre; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Bildungsmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Bildungsfernsehen; Schulfernsehen; Evaluierung; Junior High Schools; Student; Students; Sekundarstufe I; Schüler; Schülerin; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Sekundarbereich
Abstract	The goal of the Satellite Technology Demonstration (STD) is to create several types of educational television programs for a varied audience beamed by a communication satellite. The first program produced--"Time Out!"-- was a career exploration series written for junior high students. A "formative" semester permitted the series to be shown over 16 weeks to one audience and then revised by an internal review panel. STD made the following recommendations: (1) In cases of limited resources and a diverse audience, evaluation by a review panel, supplemented with audience data, is more satisfactory than the use of selected audience members or consultants; (2) panel should be composed of 5-6 members possessing a variety of knowledge and responsibilities and should include those responsible for implementing the results; (3) evaluation should be initiated simultaneously with video-production development; (4) members should make independent ratings, but should share findings in group dialog; (5) whenever possible, the primary source of similar evaluations should be done by the original audience with a panel used as a supplementary source. (NR)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC